Tuesday, April 25, 2023

Existenceproof

"What would your feelings be, seriously, if your cat or your dog began to talk to you, and to dispute with you in human accents? You would be overwhelmed with horror. I am sure of it. And if the roses in your garden sang a weird song, you would go mad. And suppose the stones in the road began to swell and grow before your eyes, and if the pebble that you noticed at night had shot out stony blossoms in the morning?"
-Arthur Machen, The White People


There are moldy spots in the rank cracks of academia - para-maths, juxta-chromatics, alt-history, and those other fetid fields which are sometimes erroneously put under the umbrella of impossibilogy, whose students are quacks and cranks and snake-oil guzzlers - disciples one and all of the unreal. Theirs is dangerous work, more dangerous than could be imagined by the epidemologist or nuclear physicist, for the latter remain within the bounds of the bounded, the concrete and finite. For those in the univers(e/ity)'s light, death is the end, the only end, sometimes feared, sometimes welcomed, but always definite. You can, of course, imagine other ends than death. That's the appeal of these studies of the unreal: to let the imagination slip from the blessed limits of humanity and this cosmos, and return with the illicit fruits of infinity.

If this sounds too simple, too easy, consider going to the grocery store to pick up fruit. There might be dozens of varieties of fruit to choose from, but you know what you like, and where to look to find it. Now consider a grocery store that's got every fruit on Earth in it, piled up in neat rows and stacks of bins and baskets. You might be looking for quite some time to find what you want. You might even be allergic to some of the fruits and not even know it. Consider even further: a grocery store that's got every fruit the Earth's ever had or will have, every enormous prehistoric deviance and genetically-engineered vegan-friendly meat-thing. You might get lost in the aisles, and never find your way out. Even if you did, you might've brushed up against the wrong bin, and brought home a seed that invades and overgrows a continent. But of course we're not just talking about every fruit here, but everything and anything. As much as you need to open the spaces of possibility, you need to close them off.

This act of closing off, of denying unwanted possibilities, is called existenceproofing. The exact process varies tremendously, as you might expect - you might invoke the null-number huil, paint grim lines of bronte, and so on and so on, depending on the field you're working in and the result you're working toward. The ideal is the same: surgically precise excision.

Existenceproofing carries its own risks. Lookbackonwhatyou'vereadandseehowthegapsshapethecontent. Solidity alone has no structure, and in this is indistinguishable from total emptiness - form requires void, and in the intermingling both solidity and void attain their own structure. Existenceproofing is the art of voiding - and if it is too graceless, or too artful, it can give birth to monsters.

The trailblazer of existenceproofing cut away too much, leaving an abyss that swallowed them up like a sudden vacuum into howling chaos - no record or legacy of them now survives besides this abyss. Buildings and parts of buildings that shouldn't be spring up in the wake of the inexpert existenceproofer, for buildings are defined as much or more by the cavities within them as by their bricks and planks.

Life of a sort too is not an uncommon by-product - for life doesn't require any particular substance, or even non-substance, just an ordering system - as the proliferation of trypophobic plagues in recent years attests to. Living silhouettes are among the worst of these voided life-forms (at least, among the worst that don't swiftly lead to the end of a world-line), empty vessels in the shapes of people. More paranoid members of occulture believe that crowd is already fully infiltrated by them. And some say all these bizarre studies are only able to achieve tangible results because the world itself has been existenceproofed - a nonentity slowly dissolving into gibberish as it wakes up to that fact.

4 comments:

  1. ! I love that Machen story, I have used lines from it for epigrams myself. This is really good - creepy in the best of ways, a horror that was present all along that you only now see because it is revealed through the text. Great stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Really love the direction you're going with this. As usual it's a brilliant writeup, and as we've said previously I'm really liking this numinous meta-science stuff.

    This idea of Existenceproofing is also awesome. It's like the sayings about only bending or breaking rules that you understand or have mastered.

    So much of what I love with TTRPGs, much more so than like punching orcs with axes or whatever, or even OSR-ian problem solving, is this kind of Wonderlandian / Doctor Who-ian problem solving, where the goal in the first place is just to figure out how to interface with the world, then leveraging that knowledge to alter the world itself.

    My only qualm with this might be, as opposed to the SCP-ish type stuff (note: I mostly am only familiar with SCP through RPG blog posts, do not follow it regularly), I generally prefer to focus on exploration, growth and advancement, etc., vs. maintaining the status quo, compartmentalizing, etc., which anecdotally seems way more over-represented in settings of this kind right now as far as I can tell.

    That said, Existenceproofing as a concept, or embedded within a broader setting, need not be explicitly about limiting possibilities of what existence can be.

    I think of Star Trek, where yes they have a Prime Directive, but one of the key themes of the setting is in recognizing the need for this value and bureaucratic system, while also recognizing a need for the flexibility of individuals to occasionally break this rule in order to stay truer to the spirit of the Federation's values. I'm not even saying I agree with that entirely, but it's much more nuanced than most people give it credit for, it allows for deep exploration of various ideas; whether I 100% agree with that premise or not, I value what it allows for in the setting. One could imagine something very similar but from a more anarcho-socialist perspective, which I think is a cleaner synthesis of the ideals represented in Star Trek than a hierarchical bureaucracy.

    Anyway, a good campaign of Existenceproofers, to me, would be one in which they are often incentivized to not Existenceproof a thing, either because it would be cruel, or because not doing so might open up possibilities for good; and in having to deal with the consequences either way- that neither is obviously right nor wrong, and it is just about being conscientious, open-minded, and either way, necessitating a good-faith attempt at understanding the unknown.

    What do you do with extra-dimensional refugees? What about some hyper-platonic form of free energy not subject to the power square law? What about an inverse frequency oscillation device that can holographically project probability fields that invert entropy and in effect allow for localized time reversal? I dunno, but I want to find out...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The seed of this post came to me while reading God & Golem, Inc. - I saw the phrase "existence proof", and the whole concept from there sprang into my head in an instant.

      The seed of this "numinous meta-science" in general is, as I realized in the course of writing this post, poetry - math-as-language used for poetry, and then reified in this fantastical setting, and so on - establishing rule through language, the swords of the kingdom of philosophy.

      Now, that put out there, existenceproofing isn't a standalone procedure - it's the seal of Solomon, attempting to avoid the scenario of the Sorcerer's Apprentice, or the metastasizing of Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius, and the unintended consequences of attempting to avoid unintended consequences - particularly where these result in a worldview hostile or just indifferent to human flourishing. Less playing border-guard for extra-dimensional refugees, more like making sure your attempts to cultivate the wasteland don't just result in the end in more wasteland. Also, don't know if it came through, but I was intentionally writing this post with a more negative tone on "the numinous meta-sciences" - of course, the power of poetry is in presenting imaginative visions which reveal & expand beyond the world as it may immediately appear to us.

      Personally, would prefer a hierarchical bureaucracy to anarcho-socialism. Better track record, on the whole - and of course, a hierarchical bureau of the people, by the people, and for the people.

      Delete
    2. I don't remember that specific line but that's awesome that this came from God & Golem!

      > The seed of this "numinous meta-science" in general is, as I realized in the course of writing this post, poetry - math-as-language used for poetry,...

      Love this!

      > Less playing border-guard for extra-dimensional refugees, more like making sure your attempts to cultivate the wasteland don't just result in the end in more wasteland.

      Ya this is fair, I think this is consistent with the idea I was expressing about understanding the dynamic consequences of basically any kind of non-linear action. Magical Industrial Revolution is for instance a great example of how to look at the negative consequences of non-linear action, but also I think it's easier to imagine how to break things than it is to imagine how to build things, and increasingly I find the latter more interesting; but of course, one can't build things that are functional and sustainable if they don't consider the potential fail-states.

      > Personally, would prefer a hierarchical bureaucracy to anarcho-socialism. Better track record, on the whole - and of course, a hierarchical bureau of the people, by the people, and for the people.

      I've been getting increasingly radicalized haha but I don't entirely disagree. It's more so that I think it is something to aspire towards; it is also imo more interesting, or at least more creatively compelling, to try to conceive of a functional system beyond the preconceived constraints of statehood and bureaucracy. That said, a functional hierarchical bureaucracy of the people, by the people, and for the people, would also be rather novel lolol.

      Delete